Paul Musgrave is interviewed on the local public affairs program Connecting Point about how in one of his courses, he assigns students an essay and podcast on the politics of the end of the world. He says while students find it challenging, they often enjoy learning to think about possible events they hadn’t previously considered. 

1. Podcast: "Why Washington can't escape the West Wing".
2. JSTOR "The Civilian Solution to Bank Robberies", Paul Musgrave quoted.
3. "The Missing Links: Choosing and Rejecting International Issue Linkages in the Presidential Interest". Presidential Studies Quarterly.
4. "Universities Aren't Ready for Trade War Casualties", Foreign Policy.
5. U.S. Tariff War with China, Connecting Point.
6. "IR Theory and 'Game of Thrones' Are Both Fantasies" Foreign Policy.

Charli Carpenter published an article in Foreign Affairs titled: “Game of Thrones as Theory” back in 2012 and it's now highlighted in light of the Game Of Thrones finale. The article explains how the show is not as Machiavellan as it seems, and is instead a deeply progressive, human-security-focused narrative about power, justice and the dangers of unchecked realpolitik. (Foreign Affairs, 5/19/19)

Among the foreign-policy intelligentsia, and society broadly, interpreting Game of Thrones (and the book series by George R. R. Martin that the show is based on) has become a cottage industry. Every political analyst, historian, or theorist has his or her take on what lessons can be drawn from the story for real-world foreign policy. This enthusiasm tells us something about the show’s political implications: fans and writers argue over Game of Thrones precisely because there is power in interpreting a story to support one’s own arguments about what is right and who gets to choose. (Foreign Affairs, 5/27/19)

In 1972, the US Congress passed Title IX  to address sex discrimination in educational institutions receiving federal aid. Four decades on, Elizabeth A. Sharrow, James N. Druckman and Jacob E. Rothschild take a close look at current perceptions of how Title IX has been implemented, with a specific focus on its effects on college athletes. They find that not only are student athletes aware that there should be gender equity – and in fact recognize existing inequities – they are also willing to take action to promote more equitable practices by universities.